Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm
I hope it doesn’t. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
(FTC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:29 am
Merial LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 9:39 am
For example, in the Matter of MMH v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 9:39 am
For example, in the Matter of MMH v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:44 am
The workers brought a putative class action suit alleging violations of the AWPA, the Washington Consumer Protection Act (CPA), and Washington wage laws. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 11:27 pm
New York State beefed up protections for some private and public sector workers. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 11:27 pm
New York State beefed up protections for some private and public sector workers. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:03 am
As our Maine food poisoning injury attorneys know, all food manufacturers owe a duty of care to their customers to protect against food-borne illnesses. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
The online contract formation cases are coming out at an accelerating pace, so we can’t keep up with them all. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:19 pm
While Janssen Pharmaceutical and Johnson & Johnson can be held liable for the damages caused by Risperdal and Invega, a 2011 decision by the United States Supreme Court protects most makers of generic risperidone/paloperidone from litigation. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 2:45 pm
This doesn’t render it harmless, but I doubt the risk posed is significant enough for people to give up cars and other forms of modern transportation. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
This case is a consumer protection lawsuit against a payday lender, MoneyMutual. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
(The Rule 40 account is a parody, in case that isn’t clear)The USOC was particularly aggressive about enforcing its trademarks in the days leading up to the summer games in Rio. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 5:38 am
Chester v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
This issue came up a few years ago in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm
Market factors: consumers’ taste for innovation in a particular field v. borrowing. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
Copyright trolling: buying up (or not!) [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
I like opinions in trademark infringement cases that don’t just gloss over LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION issues, but I have to admit I wasn’t ready for what awaited me when, after seeing the tweet reproduced below from Bill Donahue, I undertook to dig into yesterday’s ruling by the Southern District of New York in Citigroup, Inc. v. [read post]
