Search for: "US v. Williams" Results 2021 - 2040 of 10,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
This posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Cat litter manufacturer Clorox was preliminarily enjoined by the federal district court in New York City from airing a television commercial making comparative claims about cat litter odor reduction.Competitor Church & Dwight (C & D) was likely to succeed on the merits of its Lanham Act false advertising suit that the commercial made literally false claims based on an unreliable “lab test,” and… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:00 pm by Robert L. Mues
 According to a study released on May 25, 2020 by the Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law at UCLA , same-sex weddings have generated $3.8 billion in local and state economic activity in the United States since the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage five years ago this month in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:43 am
Donnell, Judge.Representing Appellant Cook: William D. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:42 am by Meg Martin
Murphy of Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, PC, Casper, Wyoming.Representing Appellee HKM: Matthew F. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:38 pm by Meg Martin
Williams, Douglas, Wyoming.Representing State: Bruce A. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:38 am
The case, said the judge in the case management conference, would depend on whether it would be possible to establish that there had been copying: copying might be complete and identical [as in Art & Allposters, discussed by Tom Ohta on the IPKat here], "exact" or "altered / inexact", as in Designers Guild v Russell Williams, here. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am by Aaron Tang
Which is not to say that this is how the Court will decide Williams v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:05 pm
US Bank    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0617n.06 USA v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 1:37 pm by Patricia Salkin
City of Salisbury v Riverside Investment Corp, 2016 WL 706917 (MD unrep. 2/23/2016)  Filed under: Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses, Uncategorized [read post]