Search for: "United States v. All Right, Title & Interest" Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
All writers to date have considered ways in which rights guaranteed by secular courts can be maintained before religious tribunals. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
All writers to date have considered ways in which rights guaranteed by secular courts can be maintained before religious tribunals. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am by Michael O'Brien
 This blog has previously explained how social insurance works in the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:18 pm
The majority relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:00 am by Karen Tani
By the 1960s, however, the United States had become a predominantly urban/suburban society; population had shifted to metropolitan areas but political power had not followed. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm by Roy Ginsburg
After the case was filed in 2001, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified the class in 2004. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Rather, all other treaties permit review of claims of political motivation to be made by the Secretary of State. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:10 am by admin
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court found in favor of Wal-Mart, ending the eleven year Dukes v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
Ruhul ANAM v the United Kingdom – 21783/08 [2011] ECHR 940 (7 June 2011): Bangladeshi with series of criminal convictions fails to halt deportation in European Court of Human Rights on family life grounds. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:41 pm by Greg Mersol
They brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate on August 2, 1979. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:05 pm
The Act does not state that title in an invention is expressly vested in contractors or anyone else or that inventors are deprived of their priority interest in federally funded inventions (picture, below right - the building that stands for all things federal). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:17 am by Richard Alderman
The court stated: "In 1993, the MERS system was created by several large participants in the real estate mortgage industry to track  ownership interests in residential mortgages" (Matter of MERSCORP, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Since it was possession of property, not ownership, which gave title to sue for possession, the claimant’s right to possession of his passport was sufficient to give him title to sue for conversion and his letters to the secretary of state in May 2010 amounted to an unconditional demand for the return of the passport, with or without a visa. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:10 am by Lisa McElroy
  He sued Vice and the town in state court for both state and federal claims, including a claim that Vice had violated his civil rights by interfering with his right to seek public office. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:18 am by Ronald Mann
  The Court also noted that Congress on several occasions has departed from that rule explicitly, adopting statutes providing that title to certain classes of inventions “vests in” the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:29 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, the Court held that a federal sentencing court must determine whether “an offense under State law” is a “serious drug offense” by consulting the “maximum term of imprisonment” applicable to a defendant’s prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant’s conviction for that offense. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
A United States patent is presumed valid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]