Search for: "United States v. Andrews" Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:05 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
A federal judge’s forceful opinion Wednesday in favor of same-sex marriage is only the beginning of a process that is likely to go all the way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
United States The father of a victim of the massacre at Sandy Hook, has won a defamation suit against the authors of a book called Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, purporting a series of false claims. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
Canada-Cameroon BIT signing; photo from DFATD In Hupacasath First Nation v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
” Experts criticized the decision as potentially limiting the United States’ ability to obtain a vaccine developed by a member of COVAX in the future. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 6:51 am by Lyle Denniston
The government lawyers said that, if the Supreme Court were to rule in favor of the government in the pending case of United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am by Adam Klasfeld
Over the course of two days of oral arguments, former President Donald Trump’s attorneys aimed at the 150-year-old foundations of the practice of appointing special counsels in the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there was a hearing in the case of Adams v Johnson. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
Pant advised the State to stop taking criticism of governance as a personal insult. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
Cooter and Siegel, for example, believe that a Resolution VI-based reading of Article I, Section 8 support revisiting the analysis in United States v. [read post]