Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug" Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm by thejaghunter
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put Arizona on noticeceded US land to Mexican drug lords. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm by Anna Christensen
United States (08-876) Argued: Dec. 8, 2009 Issue: Whether the “honest services” clause of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Desmarais is also registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
§4248 in United States v, Comstock on the basis that the Constitution does not grant the Federal government authority to institutionalize them beyond their maximum prison commitment. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:51 pm by Michael DelSignore
Under the United States Supreme Court interpretation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the defendant was clearly not seized as the United States Supreme Court held in a case called California v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:50 pm by Peter Rost
You do not acquire ownership rights to any article, document or other materials viewed through the Site. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:14 am by Carl Folsom
United States to keep prior drug convictions from triggering certain "mandatory" sentencing enhancements (ACCA and 851 enhancements):At issue in Shepard was whether a state burglary conviction triggered the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), a federal recidivist statute. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm by ALeonard
  In many respects, being on the Supreme Court is like being President of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
Food and Drug Administration, so that it can align--that is, harmonize--its regulations with international standards developed by powerful vested interests. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm by Rick
  It is worth noting that in the recent United States Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:36 am by David Kopel
 In a state v. state case, a state can assert the interests of its nationals. [read post]