Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 9,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm
Iqbal is a 2009 decision of the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) that may have an impact on the standard applied to motions to dismiss in state courts with rules that are modeled on the federal rules. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:05 am
’ United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:32 am
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, with Chief Justice John Roberts taking no part in the decision or petition. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 7:04 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
See Elrod v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 5:26 pm
In fact in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 12:56 pm
" United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
United States, 132 S. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:14 am
Tatra, a.s. has national trademark registrations for TATRA in the United States and the European Community and is also the owner of a number of other TATRA and TATRA-family trademark registrations around the word, including the International Trademark Registry. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:30 am
In 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States limited third-party (often grandparent) visitation rights in Troxel v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:52 am
In Vazquez v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner alleged that she was required to perform the out-of-title duty of supervising the entire child support unit without a concomitant increase in pay (see Matter of New York State Corr. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner alleged that she was required to perform the out-of-title duty of supervising the entire child support unit without a concomitant increase in pay (see Matter of New York State Corr. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 4:40 am
" A short time later the United States Supreme Court decided Ricci v DeStefano (557 US 557), holding that, "before an employer can engage in intentional discrimination for the asserted purpose of avoiding or remedying an unintentional disparate impact, the employer must have a strong basis in evidence to believe it will be subject to disparate-impact liability if it fails to take the race-conscious discriminatory action. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
The recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Pan American Grain Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 1:07 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has once again taken up the burden to review the case of Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 1:00 am
But the application was filed more than one year after she entered the United States, thus violating the filing deadline. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 10:51 am
United States v. [read post]
