Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 2021 - 2040 of 44,299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This statement does not necessarily deny deference to agency interpretations as it seemingly focused on the first step in the Chevron test, viz whether there is ambiguity in the legislative text with regard to the issue at hand. [read post]
Conversely,  the United States contends that “and” is used to join (a), (b), and (c) by distributing the phrase “does not have. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am by Zak Gowen
Einer Elhauge, has stated:  “Dozens of empirical studies have now confirmed this economic reality that common shareholding alters corporate behavior. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Surveillance On 12 September 2023, The European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in Wieder and Guarnieri v. the United Kingdom (nos. 64371/16 and 64407/16). [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 1:04 pm by Amy Howe
United States, a case involving federal sentencing laws that – at least according to the defendant – turns on whether the word “and” in the federal law at issue means “and” or instead “or. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm by Ilya Somin
Code Section 1441, which allows defendants to remove to federal court "any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 8:59 am by Amy Howe
As a result, the agents told him, he would be unable to return to the United States – unless he agreed to become an informant for the FBI. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
" Similarly, the United States Supreme Court has explained that government employees have certain limitations on their freedom that they must accept in the workplace. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
The rule prevents the funding from being used to directly or indirectly benefit countries “engaged in conduct that is detrimental to the national security or foreign policy of the United States. [read post]