Search for: "Wells v. State" Results 2021 - 2040 of 66,435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2016, 8:23 am by Bob Farb
West Virginia’s statute allowing the carrying of a concealed weapon with a permit may be such an example, based on the February 23, 2016, ruling of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 8:23 am by Bob Farb
West Virginia’s statute allowing the carrying of a concealed weapon with a permit may be such an example, based on the February 23, 2016, ruling of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:35 pm by Lawrence Solum
However, it will also confirm the overall importance of the petitioner‘s institutional arguments, as well as the institutional counter-arguments (in favor of non-state, Muslim civil dispute resolution institutions) that the petitioner‘s arguments have elicited. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
As is well-known, the Internet knows no borders, which at times poses difficult questions on states regarding how to exercise jurisdiction and in particular how to pursue their interests without interfering illegitimately with other states. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:24 am by Richard Primus
  Right now, there is a pending suit in state court in New York raising that next question.The suit, Zervos v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Chris Hajec
Hajec is Director of Litigation at the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which filed an amicus brief in support of the administration in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm by John Rubin
The United States Supreme Court held long ago, in the 1902 case of Minder v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:51 pm by JURIST Staff
  On Thursday, a 2-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India delivered a split judgment in the case of Aishat Shifa v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Betsy McKenzie
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]