Search for: "Whiting v. United States" Results 2021 - 2040 of 6,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Reference Staff
The 11-member commission surveyed 25 cities where unrest had occurred, including Newark, Detroit, Cincinnati, and Atlanta.The Commission’s research produced some shocking findings about racial and economic inequality in the United States and included the famous quote: “Our nation is moving toward two societies, one black, one white — separate and unequal. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
It is a known feat of the Mexican Government to redraw borders and extract the wealth from the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm by Edward Blum
If the new Justice analyzes the current state of minority electoral opportunity in the United States as did Scalia, the new statute probably won’t survive constitutionality. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:39 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-8737, and Gibbs v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 4:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Gaming Compact – Approval) Kialegee Tribal Town v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:22 am
[6/9/09 PM Update:  The United States Supreme Court just cleared the Chrysler sale! [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
” Several individuals complained about the advertisements to the State Consumer Rights Protection Authority (“SCRPA”). [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 9:58 am by Cynthia L. May
         Brenda Chaney, a black certified nursing assistant (CNA), sued her former employer nursing home where a resident in her unit demanded white-only health care providers. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by admin
The mere cross-reference to provisions of the United States Code and Code of Federal Regulations does not specifically describe the acts addressed by the injunction. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
This requirement is consistent with the limitation imposed upon state-taxpayer standing in federal courts in Doremus v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
United States and California (Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-00167) (previous HL Pulse discussion here). [read post]
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]