Search for: "Brand v. Brand"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 9,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2014, 11:13 am
Hokto Kinoko Company v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:25 pm
Eshelby v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm
Clearly there is huge value in the St Andrews name when used as a brand but, given that it is descriptive and/or an indication of geographic origin, is there a case here for a Certification Mark and/or PGI/PDO? [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:05 am
Has the law taken all the funout of retail branding? [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:51 am
Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 3:47 am
The new generic Top Level Domains (gTLDS), unpopular with many brand owners, are set to come. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:42 am
Newman Cigar Company v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 5:46 am
Luxul Technology Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:59 am
Gallo Winery v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:00 pm
On the evidence, it was possible that Media Brands had been the gatekeeper for the supply of JUMPSTAR products in the UK. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:17 pm
This was one of the most fought over issues in the Louboutin v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:51 am
And if universities take the lead in responsible brand-building, perhaps they will set a good example for other commercial sectors in which goods and services are supplied under the limp banner of pathetic slogans that may mean a lot to their owners but which are rarely if ever considered to be brands or origin identifiers by the public at large.Merpel agrees: she recalls the admirable expression "limping trade marks", coined by Jacob J (as he then was) in Philips Electonics… [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:14 am
Caterpillar Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 1:16 pm
In L'Oréal SA and others v Bellure NV and others [2010] EWCA Civ 535[noted here by the IPKat] a comparative advertisement was held to constitute unfair practice where one brand had taken unfair advantage of the reputation of another well-known brand by free-riding on the coat tails of their success. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:18 pm
This is not the first, nor is it likely to be the last time, that fashion houses have opposed the registration of trade marks that concern their brand names: both Chanel and Gucci have aggressively protected their trade marks in respect of their brand names in the past. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:02 pm
Eli Lilly and Company, et al., Civil Action No. 2:12-62 and Marston v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:10 pm
See Rogers v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:10 pm
See Rogers v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:39 pm
Green Bullion Financial Services, LLC v. [read post]
