Search for: "CONDIT et al. v. CONDIT et al." Results 2041 - 2060 of 3,054
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
Cullen issued his decision July 12, 2006. *** The McBurney Corp. (26-CA-17564, et al.; 352 NLRB No. 35) Norcross, GA Feb. 29, 2008. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm by Matthew Bush
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Conditional cross-petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Los Angeles County Police Chiefs' Association et al.Reply of petitioner Agarano v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
FORD LILLIAN WAN, JJ. 2019-14251 (Index No. 608005/19) [*1]In the Matter of Town of Hempstead, petitioner, vNew York State Division of Human Rights, et al., respondents. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
FORD LILLIAN WAN, JJ. 2019-14251 (Index No. 608005/19) [*1]In the Matter of Town of Hempstead, petitioner, vNew York State Division of Human Rights, et al., respondents. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 4:01 am by Steven Gursten
Stoddard, et al.) are once again decided on the basis of an accurate interpretation of Michigan law. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:02 am by Joy Waltemath
The named plaintiff filed a motion to conditionally certify a nationwide collective action of call center employees and former employees who were dissuaded by the employer, like she claimed to have been, from joining another nationwide collective action (Andrews et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Page Keeton, et al., Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts §96, at 686 (5th ed. 1984). [read post]