Search for: "DUKES v. STATE" Results 2041 - 2060 of 2,251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
(Michael Geist) Google agrees to pay $125 million to authors and publishers affected by Google Print service, settling copyright litigation (Ars Technica) Google is done paying Silicon Valley’s legal bills (EFF) Apple bends to studios, adds copyright protection to MacBooks (Wired) Website parodying Union Square Partnership shut down due to bogus cybersquatting and copyright infringement claims (EFF) Singers Daryl Hall and John Oates sue Warner/Chappell Music for failing to sue others for… [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:29 am
In other words, the paradigm case for the Roberts Court's restriction of the spending power is likely to be not United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 10:59 am
Supreme Court denied certiorari in the North Carolina judicial public financing case, Duke v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:59 am
Supreme Court denied certiorari in the North Carolina judicial public financing case, Duke v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:06 pm
The campaign finance case turned aside by the Court Monday (Duke, et al., v . [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 9:31 am
They oppose what they regard as liberal judicial activism (e.g., Roe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Serving as Chief Justice of the United States was Duke Law School Dean, and former Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, David F. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:36 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (awaiting from counsel) Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 08-120 Title: Duke, Jr., et al. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 10:08 am
The court voted 7-2 to reject federal and state prosecutors' petitions [JURIST report] for rehearing of the case. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Federal criminal trial lawyer, Russell Mace, also argued that stalking should not be a crime of violence under United States Sentencing Guideline (U.S.S.G) 2K2.1 and 4B1.2 because it does not meet the test set out in the recent Supreme Court decision of Begay v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 10:00 am
Capable family law practitioners have always directed their effort and creativity toward reaching agreement rather than duking it out in court. [read post]