Search for: "Doe 103" Results 2041 - 2060 of 3,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
Sale of Equipment and Software for an Automated Assembly SystemContract DraftingBreach of ContractPreemption by the Copyright ActCopyright InfringementLicense RightsMisappropriationUnfair CompetitionTrade SecretTollingTort: Continuing Tort TheoryEquitable ReliefComputer Source CodeSoftware17 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:21 am by Matrix Law
Paragraph 4.4 of the Code of Ethics is wrong and misleading as it does not reflect the test in the 2008 and 2012 Regulations [102-103]. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:47 am by Rantanen
  According to the Federal Circuit:  “If the patented feature does not drive the demand for the product, sales would be lost even if the offending feature were absent from the accused product. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:11 am by Brian Wm. Higgins
” Thus, Bilski does not preclude patenting business methods, or software, as many in that industry feared might result. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:38 am by Gene Quinn
And the Supreme Court has told us that, while avoiding confusion between §101 and §§102 and 103, merely adding existing computer technology to abstract ideas — mental steps — does not as a matter of substance convert an abstract idea into a machine. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:16 pm
In 2003, Rai promoted the 95% grant rate figure of Quillen and Webster; footnote 5 of 103 Colum. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:34 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent No. 5,597,767 (the ‘767 patent) does not incorporate by reference U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:11 am by Dennis Crouch
  Although this obviously does not permit the agency to rule contrary to the statute. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 1:47 pm
  While item 103 of Regulation S-K may requires disclosure of material derivative claims, it does not require disclosure of the appointment of a SLC, still less a description of the SLC's process or decision. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:56 am by emagraken
  The evidence does not support the claim that medical marijuana is reasonably necessary: see Milina v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 10:16 pm by nyinjuries
In addition, the number of state and federal fines dropped slightly from 103 to 99 (though the amount fined increased from $1,413,183 to 1,456,245). [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:38 am by WSLL
  Further, on its face, § 24-9-103(d) also does not authorize an award of appraisal costs. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 3:13 pm
It does not include communications to existing clients or other lawyers. [read post]