Search for: "Doe Entities 1-25" Results 2041 - 2060 of 2,849
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2014, 6:51 pm
"It is well settled that a corporation's attorney represents the corporate entity, not its shareholders or employees ". [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 Likewise, the definition also does not apply to health coverage provided for employees working abroad for periods of less than six months. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 5:16 am by Marty Lederman
”  And finally, I’ll emphasize the way in which the decision in Hobby Lobby may, indeed, have a significant impact on abortion.1. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 12:10 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
  Here is how the NTIA describes the workings: (1) TLD operators submit change requests to the IANA Functions Operator [i.e. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
S. 1, 25, and the satisfaction of, e.g., “ ‘time limits, notice, laches, [or] estoppel,’ ” Howsam, 537 U. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:52 pm
To state a claim under Section 1, a plaintiff [must plead] evidentiary facts which, if true, will prove: (1) a contract, combination or conspiracy among two or more persons or distinct business entities; (2) by which the persons or entities intended to harm or restrain trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations; (3) which actually injures competition." [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:05 am by Martin Miller
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has once again reaffirmed that appellate review of patent claim interpretations is de novo, without deference to the trial court even for factual matters.1 The 6-4 en banc decision in Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Feb. 25, 2014) The hits (by which I mean FTC victories) just keep on coming. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Nowhere in the statute nor in the regulations does it at all indicate that entire classifications of employees are forestalled from being considered for L-1B transfers. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Nowhere in the statute nor in the regulations does it at all indicate that entire classifications of employees are forestalled from being considered for L-1B transfers. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Nowhere in the statute nor in the regulations does it at all indicate that entire classifications of employees are forestalled from being considered for L-1B transfers. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm by Ken White
The Ninth Circuit noted that there might be one remaining area where Gertz does not apply and a defamation plaintiff does not need to prove even negligence — if the plaintiff is a private figure and the speech is not on a matter of public concern. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:06 am by Ann Caresani
The plan administrator last paid a claim on December 24, 2009, and the complaint argues that this means the plan sponsor actually terminated the plan on December 25, 2009. [read post]