Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 2041 - 2060 of 16,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2012, 3:35 pm by Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D.
GA-0844, states that federal law does not preempt §32.0248(h)’s prohibition on contracting with entities that are affiliates of entities that perform or promote elective abortions. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 3:04 am
She is a criminal defense appellate lawyer who works at a public defense firm, although she seldom writes about what she does, and really never writes about the law. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The fact that s. 14(1)(b) of the Code does not require intent by the publisher or proof of harm, or provide for any defences does not make it overbroad.... [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 7:09 am by Krzysztof Pacula
Last December AG Pikamäe presented his Opinion in the preliminary reference procedure concerning that request (for remarks on the Opinion and the case itself, see also contribution of Geert van Calster on his blog), i.e. in the case H Limited, C-568/20. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:31 am by Mark Summerfield
In case you are not familiar with these names (although most readers of this blog would most likely have heard of at least one of them): Judge Lucy H Koh is the judge of the US District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose, who is presiding over the patent dispute between Apple and Samsung in that court, and who recently issued preliminary injunctions against Samsung’s Galaxy Nexus and Galaxy Tab 10.1 devices; Judge William Alsup is the judge of the US District… [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:47 am by Ronald Mann
Is it enough for the defendant to show that the applicant couldn’t reasonably believe that the application was accurate, or does the defendant have to show that the applicant actually knew that the application included incorrect information? [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 10:20 am by Giles Peaker
The mention of section 21 at section 44 of the H(W)A was distinct. [read post]