Search for: "Does 1 - 41" Results 2041 - 2060 of 4,707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2007, 8:16 am
" If the court grants the motion, it returns the property; if it does not grant the motion, you don't get your property back.Nothing in the law is simple, but basically the rule is that a court should not grant a Rule 41(g)-style motion for the return of seized property as long as there is a criminal case "pending" against the owner, a case with regard to which the property is relevant as evidence. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm by Margaret Taylor
The 41-page opinion is lengthy, thorough and detailed, given the relative simplicity of the issues. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 2:08 pm by Alex Ely
But until it does so, the lawyer went on, “the Courts should adopt the interpretation of the ECPA that creates the least international discord. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:16 pm by INFORRM
In this case, the right of the applicant to inform the public and the public’s right to receive information had to be balanced against the right of those who testified to respect for the private lives and the impartiality of the judiciary [41]. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am by Vladyslav Lanovoy
Al Haq argued that Criterion 1(b) does not require a predictive assessment and sets a “lower” standard than Criterion 2(c). [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:20 am by INFORRM
The ECtHR also found violations of Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty) and of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial). [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 6:02 am by Bill Marler
As many as 53 sickens, 13 hospitalized with 1 likely liver transplant. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:25 am by Bill Marler
As many as 53 sickens, 13 hospitalized with 1 likely liver transplant. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:52 am by admin
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Remy Roizen wrote: > >        In the first year of law school, most students will take Criminal Law. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:31 am by Andrew Frisch
More importantly, Lynn’s Food does not expressly address the issue of whether parties can voluntarily withdraw a case under Rule 41. [read post]