Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 2041 - 2060 of 37,522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 2:18 am by Frank Cranmer
Article 14 did not prohibit a member state from treating groups differently in order to correct “factual inequalities” between them, and the Divisional Court had addressed in great detail the significant hardship faced by the Orthodox Jewish community of poverty affecting employment and education opportunities, prejudice when renting in the private sector on account of their appearance, language and religion, and an exponential increase in anti-Semitic hate crime. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 10:37 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) McNeill, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 553 (27 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mamki, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 307 (08 April 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Gentoo Group Ltd & Anor v Hanratty [2008] EWHC 627 (QB) (07 April 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) The Mayor of London, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:26 pm by Embassy Law
In a 14 page opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed the District Court in the matter MBI Group, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Su represented another group of garment workers, again pursing a retailer that did business with the allegedly errant garment manufacturers. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am by Lyle Denniston
The “state secrets” cases are General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Under its terms, a group of states casting 270 electoral votes—the simple majority required to elect a president—would bind their electors to cast their ballots for the national popular vote winner, thereby avoiding the disparity that occurred most recently in 2000 and 2016. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:04 am
Mechanisms must be found, whether directly or through the Member States, to ensure that the views of individuals, interest groups and academic and practising lawyers are fully taken into account at all stages of the legislative process. [read post]