Search for: "Gay v. State"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 3,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
In Ulane v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:53 am
Its decision in Perez v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Pennsylvania may have gone mysteriously red in the dark of election night, but a federal judge in that state has just ruled that Title VII prohibits sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
The DOMA (Section 3) case before the high court was United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
AEP Texas North -- power of state utility regulators to decide whether federally approved wholesale energy rates have been violated. 06-1471, Gay v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:38 am
— United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:59 pm
Follow us on this quick legal journey (judges, ask a PD to help you out on the law)In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:42 am
The three cases are Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
” Charlotte Garden analyzes Wednesday’s decision in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am
Perry, et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:33 am
When Deputy AG Krueger argued that other state supreme courts have not found a right to gay marriage, George pointed out that most of those decisions have been only by one vote. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:30 pm
But as Justice Kennedy suggested in Boumediene v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
Brown (now Hollingsworth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:12 pm
On its face, Carson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:20 am
The first of yesterday’s two cases, Gill v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 11:14 am
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm
Circuit Judge Paul V. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:22 am
Federalism skeptics have argued for years that Printz is a trivial entitlement because the feds can costlessly bypass the states by enforcing national law with their own federal personnel. [read post]
