Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 4,774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2016, 4:22 pm
Newly Published Cases for Explanation or Comment Family Court Judgment published to promote children’s interests, in spite of likely identification of those children: Re X (3) [2016] EWFC B91 (12 October 2016) is a recently published family court judgment on disagreements about child arrangements between separated parents. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:26 am
G.S. 8-57(c). [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:26 am
G.S. 8-57(c). [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:55 pm
Negligently Causing Damage & Loss by Intentional Access: Section: (a)(5)(C); Penalty: 1 (10). [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:56 pm
Employee benefit plans and tax-exempt organizations facing Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audits or investigations after April, 2016, their leaders and advisors should prepare for some changes in the practices IRS agents will use to issue and enforce document requests (IDRs). [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:51 am
In the context of criminal law,`the principle requires that [c]riminal statutes should be clear and understandable . . . [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:58 am
A couple of months before her expected due date, the employee provided her employer with a doctor’s note saying she would need to go on maternity leave because she would need to rest before her scheduled C-section. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 10:38 pm
For this purpose, a specified beneficiary of a trust for a taxation year is an individual who in the taxation year is beneficially interested in the trust and who (or whose spouse or common-law partner, former spouse or common-law partner or child) ordinarily inhabits the housing unit in the taxation year.Paragraph (c.1) is amended to introduce additional requirements in order for a property to qualify as a trust's principal residence for a taxation year that begins… [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:26 pm
If you find this of interest, you also be interested reviewing some of our other Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:07 am
Of interest is footnote 5, addressing the issue of visitation, which was not argued on appeal and therefore not properly before the court. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:30 am
Facts: Mother and Father, who were never married, entered an agreed parenting plan establishing a long-distance parenting schedule because of Mother’s relocation with the children to Ohio (and later Nevada). [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 9:45 am
Stay tuned… Jessica C. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
The case considers whether changes to the Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 discriminate against disabled people in breach of ECHR, art 14 taken together with art 1 of Protocol 1, and whether the respondent had failed to have regard to the best interests of a child. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 4:30 pm
Author: Michael C. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 6:33 am
§ 752.35, reversed McKellips' conviction, and ordered a new trial in the interest of justice because `the real controversy was not tried. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:34 am
Moreover, as a matter of public policy of always protecting the best interests of a child, a judge does not necessarily ask the child, point blank, whom they would rather live with. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 6:07 pm
Section 212.7(c)(5), “an alien who is subject to the foreign residence requirement and who believes that compliance therewith would impose exceptional hardship upon her spouse or child who is a citizen of the United States… may apply for a waiver on Form I-612. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 1:17 pm
At the same time, they're also increasing how much one can set (temporarily) aside in a Flexible Spending Account (for certain health and child care expenses).■ With the World Series now officially a nail-biter, it may be interesting to note how much the life insurance industry has changed in the 100+ years since the Cubs last won one. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
Rather, the law makes it a crime for any registered sex offender to either post to such a site or even read it, on the theory that the law is needed “to prevent registered sex offenders from prowling on social media and gathering information about potential child targets. [read post]
