Search for: "In re B. G."
Results 2041 - 2060
of 3,327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
Transparency Reports 999.317(g) should be deleted entirely because the DOJ has not provided adequate justification for it. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:24 am
RE 34,162, which claims a method for producing carbon-fiber sheets having properties useful in military applications, such as providing stealth qualities to aircraft. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
ATI Technologies, Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices (Patently-O) E D Wisconsin: When can a digital file be a ‘product’ under Section 271(g)? [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 7:41 pm
B. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 3:18 am
And as long as we’re talking ethics, be aware that the near-universally rejected ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) lawyer speech code is trying to make a comeback. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 2:02 am
The position remains, as laid down by Re S (A Child) ([2005] 1 AC 593) [17], with neither Article 8 nor Article 10 having precedence; a balance must be struck in each case where both rights are in play, giving due weight to the importance of open justice. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
B.J. 18 (April 2006) Shiela B. [read post]
16 May 2025, 4:31 pm
G. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:07 am
See, e. g., Kentucky v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:25 am
Frey’s opponent, Theodore B. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 10:22 am
§1225(b)(2)(A) (2012). [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:52 am
West Publ'g Co., 240 F.3d 116, 122 (2d Cir.2001), this record manifests no “erroneous view of the law or ... clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence,” In re Sims, 534 F.3d 117, 132 (2d Cir.2008), sufficient to support the conclusion that the district court abused its discretion in awarding fees. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:43 am
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:49 am
Il s’agit ici de contribuer à l’écosystème ouvert et bénéfique permis par Internet. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
LANE AND ROBERT G. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
It held that the Family Court had the authority to award attorneys’ fees pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237(b) and Family Court Act § 651(b). [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 11:55 am
Key Statutes R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) The court hearing an appeal under division (A), (B), or (C) of this section shall review the record, including the findings underlying the sentence or modification given by the sentencing court. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:09 am
NOTE: This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
