Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 8,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm
Did Justice Kennedy flip? [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
Perry, the challenge to California Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 11:12 pm
Kennedy, 301 U.S. 389,393 (1936). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:04 am
That’s what one commenter asks over here at Metafilter, about the implications of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:48 am
Most of the speculation focuses on whether the Supreme Court will issue a sweeping constitutional ruling like it did in the 1967 Loving v Virginia case [invalidating state laws that prohibited interracial marriage]. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:17 am
Having focused so much on the Rothgery and Kennedy cases in recent days, I failed to update readers on the outcome of another SCOTUS case I've been waiting on, Indiana v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
United States—the “honest services” case—has “no impact whatsoever” on its prosecution of Ring. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:37 am
(29) Wyeth v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 6:32 pm
Mechanical Contracting Ltd. v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 2:28 am
"
State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:31 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
§ 3582(c)(2) as “sentencings at which [United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:53 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:53 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:53 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 8:32 am
Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Sen. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Jonathan Siegel at PrawfsBlawg notes that Bilski v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:42 am
The key examples of the latter, of course, are Hammer v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Bolden v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 6:17 am
By now, it seems that everyone with a laptop has decided to weigh in on the Potus v. [read post]
