Search for: "LEVY V. LEVY"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 3,417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
In a way it is therefore a shame for the Administration that it has claimed that the penalty is not a tax, since the Federal government clearly is entitled to levy tax pursuant to the Constitution. [read post]
11 May 2012, 10:44 am
The court, however, citing a recent federal court decision from the District of Nevada (Nevada v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:40 pm
For more information of freezing assets in a criminal context see People v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:58 am
Is Levi’s unreasonably vain? [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:10 am
Vanity Clothing of Fargo filed a complaint in response to a cease and desist letter that it received from Levi Strauss related to the “V” pocket design on its jeans. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:37 am
Vanity responded to the letter by filing for declaratory relief against the denim giant stating that the "V" design on the back of its jeans is "visually distinctive" from Levi's jeans and that "Levi Strauss does not have the right to prevent Vanity from using a stylized version of the letter 'V' in connection with its pocket designs. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:56 am
The validity of this levy is the issue here. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
Mr Jem Aldridge v The Hunts Post (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Carl Waring v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; A woman v The Argus (Brighton) 03/05/2012; Mr Mark Gunter v Guernsey Press & Star (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Leonard Kernott v Daily Mail (Clause 3), 03/05/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Northamptonshire Evening Telegraph (Clause 1), 01/05/2012; A woman v East Riding Mail (Clauses 3, 9), 30/04/2012. [read post]
6 May 2012, 8:58 am
So says the Army CCA in a published opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:43 am
Golden Gateway v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
English cases in this category included: Smith v ADFVN ([2008] EWHC 1797 (QB)); Clift v Clarke [2011] EWHC 1164 (QB); and El Diwany v Hansen and Others ([2011] EWHC 2077 (QB)) . [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am
Levy that the military could punish Captain Howard Levy for urging African-American soldiers under his command to not fight in the Vietnam War. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:11 am
--Philip Morris v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:46 pm
Levy, and to the audience. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:08 am
Slauenwhite v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:31 am
It also recalled the 2010 CJEU judgment in the Padawan v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:42 am
In Sun Graphics Corp. v Levy, Davis & Maher, LLP 2012 NY Slip Op 03273 Decided on April 26, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department we are not told the facts behind the decision, but the decision is clear. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Instead, they are private fines levied by civil juries to punish reprehensible conduct and to deter its future occurrence. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Levy v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:46 pm
The FTB is appealing the nearly $500 million judgment that was levied against them in February 2009. [read post]
