Search for: "Law v. State" Results 2041 - 2060 of 157,477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 8:51 am by Greg Siskind
The courts have been divided regarding where the lines can be drawn constitutionally when states decide to get in the immigration lawmaking business. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:02 am
  I've worked in junk yards and law firms. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 2:03 pm by Eric Goldman
June 18, 2021) The post State Government’s Alleged Copyright Infringement Wasn’t a “Taking”–Jim Olive v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
”[8] The Supreme Court does not, as a general matter, review state court judgments resting on state law.[9] “A State’s highest court,” it has repeatedly held, “is unquestionably the ultimate expositor of state law. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by bhorton
”[8] The Supreme Court does not, as a general matter, review state court judgments resting on state law.[9] “A State’s highest court,” it has repeatedly held, “is unquestionably the ultimate expositor of state law. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Doe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Doe v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post Indian Treaty Prevails in Herrera v Wyoming appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (on application of Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:23 am by Beth Graham
Rogers, Professor of Law, Paul and Marjorie Price Faculty Scholar, and Professor of Ethics, Regulation, and The Rule of Law at Pennsylvania State University’s Dickinson School of Law, and Alex Wiker, Post-Graduate Fellow in International Arbitration at Pennsylvania State University, have published “Fraport v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The Supreme Court struck down this law as well, but not until 23 years later in Lane v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 12:24 pm
The Fifth Circuit, in an opinion released today in the appeal of Tuepker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am by Frank Pasquale
[Abigail] Moncrieff’s brief argues the petitioner’s interpretation of the statute would render the statute unconstitutional under two principles of federalism: that Congress can't coerce states into implementing federal programs, and that all states must be treated equally.As Koppelman notes below, the same states' rights ideas at the core of the conservative win in NFIB v. [read post]