Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm
John Catt has indicated that he will take the case to the European Court of Human Rights – historically the court has been far stricter on the requirement of accordance with the law and therefore far less willing to allow the state wide discretionary powers where privacy and surveillance are concerned, resulting in a series of rulings against the UK – see Malone v UK (1984), Hewitt v UK (1992), Liberty & Others v UK (2008), S &… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 4:24 pm
A similar law was declared by the House of Lords to be incompatible with the British Human Rights Act, 1998 in A v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm
Furthermore, Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Pepper v Hart said that Article IX was ‘a provision of the highest constitutional importance’ which ‘should not be narrowly construed’. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
Applying the House of Lords decision in Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v Impregilo SpA [2005] UKHL 43, Tomlinson J held that an error of law does not involve an excess of power under section 68(2)(b) of the Act. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
The working group will also hear a presentation comparing the privacy risks of legacy v. non-legacy systems. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 3:36 am
The recent House of Lords decision in R v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:38 pm
Chandler v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Surprisingly this nettle has only really been grasped once before, by the House of Lords seven years ago in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, where the question whether the abuse of process in getting the defendant deported from Zimbabwe to trial in the UK rendered his conviction so unsafe as to qualify him for compensation for miscarriage of justice. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:48 am
But today it came back to life, with the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Big Brother Watch and others v UK. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
Marzen East Carolina University and Florida State University, SSRN. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
Court of Session Judge Lord Drummond Young rules lawyer had his ‘human rights’ breached by Law Society over complaint row. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am
. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:05 am
The duplication was made manifest, rather than avoided, by the fact each expert repeatedly stated that he agreed with passages in the other expert's reports. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 1:20 pm
The court on December 4 will hear the following cases (with the issue presented as stated on the court’s website): Bourhis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
This reluctance has been captured by an admonition credited to Lord Denning about the importance of a judge not conducting the examination of witnesses because “he, so to speak, descends into the arena and is liable to have his vision clouded by the dust of conflict …” (Lord Denning was quoting Lord Greene MR, in Yuill v Yuill [1945] P 15, 20.) [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am
Regardless whether a particular jurisdiction is a "notice/prejudice" state, see Prince Georges Cty. v. [read post]
