Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 2041 - 2060 of 42,195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, opined the court, "Under a substantial evidence review, courts may not weigh the evidence or reject [the Commissioner's] choice where the evidence is conflicting and room for a choice exists" citing Matter of CUNY-Hostos Community Coll. v State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 59 NY2d 69.*** Finding that Complainant had made a prima faciecase of unlawful discrimination within the meaning of the State's Human Rights Law, the Appellate Division… [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, opined the court, "Under a substantial evidence review, courts may not weigh the evidence or reject [the Commissioner's] choice where the evidence is conflicting and room for a choice exists" citing Matter of CUNY-Hostos Community Coll. v State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 59 NY2d 69.*** Finding that Complainant had made a prima faciecase of unlawful discrimination within the meaning of the State's Human Rights Law, the Appellate Division… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 8:13 am by David Duncan
  The trial judge therefore concluded, in order to allow access to relevant, nonprivileged evidence, that a subpoena could be enforced on a showing of probable cause that the attorneys had the phone and that it contained evidence of a crime. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:28 pm
So, the argument here is that the Justice Department used the law as a pretext to detain people in order to gather evidence. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:08 am by Ogletree Abbott
The Pennsylvania Rule, said the Jones Act attorney, had shifted the burden of evidence entirely to the tug’s owners to prove that its conduct could not have been the cause of the injuries. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:25 am
 The Court may reconsider this issue when ruling on any motion for judgment as a matter of law that may be presented at trial.Id. at *8-9.We have a number of concerns with this ruling. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 2:14 am by Dennis Crouch
It is that setup that allowed the district court to rule on CLS Bank's Section 101 so early in the present case. [read post]
The DOL failed to provide any evidence of harm suffered were the implementation of the final rule delayed. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:24 pm
Given these undisputed facts, Alvin could have moved for judgment as a matter of law, citing our decision in Brown, as to this particular issue at the close of evidence. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm by Thaddeus Baria
Part of the legislation changed Wisconsin’s evidence rules governing the admissibility of witness testimony on scientific, technical or specialized subjects. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:03 pm by FDABlog HPM
  The Court ruled that without a reasonable basis for the claims, Defendants' advertising was deceptive as a matter of law. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 8:00 am
  While some are under consideration, none of them federalize the system for determining compensation, taking the matter away from Delaware. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:34 am by The Federalist Society
” The trial court denied the motion and a divided Supreme Court of Colorado ultimately affirmed, applying Colorado Rule of Evidence 606(b)--which prohibits juror testimony on any matter occurring during the jury deliberations--and finding that none of the exceptions to the rule applied. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 6:05 pm
 Although attacking a fact witness’s perception is a fair means to impeach, the evidence must still comply with the hearsay rule. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 7:19 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law on damages and rejected its argument that plaintiff implicitly invoked the entire market value rule at trial. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Robert Schaffer
’s (“Apple”) motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) after finding no reasonable juror could have found infringement based on the evidence presented during the liability phase of trial. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:49 am by Docket Navigator
The court granted in part defendants' motion in limine to exclude the value of non-asserted patents from plaintiff's inventor under Rule 403. [read post]