Search for: "Matter of Miller"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 4,470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
In Matter of Susko v Susko, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2020 WL 1056323, 2020 N.Y. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:51 pm
Krista Ivanski was fabricated to serve as defendant in the matter. [43.] [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 11:25 am
Finally, as a separate and independent general matter, the Court concurred with amicus Attorney General’s position that the EIR sufficiently disclosed its methodologies, where it did and did not consider the statewide mandates (which it did not “entirely ignore” as Citizens claimed), Plan Bay Area’s environmental impacts, and project alternatives, inter alia. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 3:13 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
The case serves as a good reminder that, no matter how important its original purpose, CEQA is subject to amendment by the Legislature for policy reasons of its choosing. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:14 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regal [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 11:29 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 6:10 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
’” In such cases, the court’s “task is ‘to determine whether, as a matter of law, the [project] met the definition of a categorically exempt project[,]’” and the court applies a do novo, rather than a substantial evidence, standard of review. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s 2012 ruling of Miller v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:02 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s 2012 ruling of Miller v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:55 am
Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976)). [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:16 am
The Supreme Court of the United States defined what is considered illegal obscenity in what has become known as “the Miller test” from Miller v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
In such cases, the court’s “task is ‘to determine whether, as a matter of law, the [project] met the definition of a categorically exempt project[,]’” and the court applies a do novo, rather than a substantial evidence, standard of review. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
The matter now returns to the High Court for compensation to be determined. [read post]
