Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 2041 - 2060 of 10,567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” In other words, at least some of them were so embarrassed by their own decision that they wrote: Don’t quote us on this! [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:04 pm by Abby Lemert, Eleanor Runde
At a Sept. 19 campaign stop, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden called TikTok’s U.S. operations “a matter of genuine concern” and promised to review the app for security issues if elected. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm by Ronald Mann
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, for example, offered a hypothetical in which a state set price floors so high that, as a practical matter, the plans couldn’t sell the covered drugs, and she then pressed Bronni to explain “why wouldn’t that scenario be preempted. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Why isn’t that a straightforward question of sexual discrimination? [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “Further delay in proposed ICO GDPR fine for Marriott”. [read post]
Instead, all the Justices merely offered their conclusions on these matters, with five Justices expressing a view in one direction. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:40 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Claire Vishik
Thus, risk assessment can often be a matter of perception, rather than evidence. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:03 am by John Bellinger, Sean Mirski
The first case was brought by Robert Glen, who alleges that he holds a claim to two beachfront properties located in one of Cuba’s most popular beach towns, Varadero. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:35 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
A few years ago, Robert Taylor and Jeff Marple of Liberty Mutual Insurance, along with Suffolk Law School’s Gabriel Teninbaum sat down at Back Bay Harry’s and hatched a genius plan over some truffle fries and sandwiches. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 5:11 pm by Josh Blackman
As a normative matter, I like Roberts's framework. [read post]
If the President were to be selected by the House under the relevant provisions that we describe below, each state—no matter its population—would get exactly one vote. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:15 am by Jennifer Davis
The Senate had broad jurisdiction over religious and judicial matters, as well over tax, war and peace, criminal (including bills of attainder), military, foreign policy (with concurrent powers with the executive), and administrative matters. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 10:10 am by SCOTUStalk
And so, you’d have three liberal justices and a really solid majority of six conservative justices. [00:02:01] And so it wouldn’t really so much matter anymore if one of the conservative justices peeled off to vote for with the liberal justices because there would still be a very solid majority of five conservative justices. [read post]