Search for: "May v. State"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2014, 8:37 am
The post provides some background information, how to use, and what results may be expected.These are useful resources if you don't have access to a subscription database but want to follow federal and state legislation.Ernster, the Virtual Library Cat [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
On November 4, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inShapiro v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:07 am
On December 8, 2015, the Supreme Court decided Shapiro v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:04 am
Phelps, the United States Supreme Court will decide to what extent state tort law may impose liability for “intentional infliction of emotional distress through outrageous conduct” without running afoul of the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:12 pm
The main issue decided by the United States Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 12:17 am
In March, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:54 am
Migrationsverket v Kastrati and Others (Case C-620/10); [2012] WLR (D) 139 “The withdrawal of an asylum application which occurred before the requested member state had agreed to take charge of the asylum seeker, had the effect that Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 which established the criteria and mechanisms for determining the member state responsible for examining an asylum application would no longer be applicable. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:18 am
On May 5, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Wiersum v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
This intent may be explicitly stated in the law (known as express preemption) or a court may infer that intent (known as implied preemption). [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:29 am
In Lamtec Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:16 pm
Kerry today, involving a conflict between Congress and the President as to which branch may give signals of recognition to foreign states. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
Relying on the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 10:22 am
The case is New York State Department of Environmental conservation, et al., v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:18 am
On May 5, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Wiersum v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 1:42 pm
In Rose v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:32 am
United States (Petition, BIO, Reply). [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:14 am
In 1996, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held in Rachal v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:29 pm
White v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
