Search for: "Miller v. United States" Results 2041 - 2060 of 2,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Manchin, Sinema Join with GOP in Rejecting Attempt to Change Filibuster Rules, Effectively Killing Democratic Voting Bill MSN – Mike DeBonis (Washington Post) | Published: 1/19/2022 The year-long Democratic push for federal voting rights legislation died in the Senate after Republicans blocked an elections bill for the fifth time in six months and Democrats failed to unite their caucus behind a plan to rewrite the chamber’s rules and pass it anyway. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 6:28 am by Jennifer Davis
Murder in Mississippi : United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm by Margaret Wood
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
  In Binder, the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “Court”) focused on whether Plaintiffs had ownership of the trademarks and whether Defendants' use of the trademark through Google’s AdWords program was "likely to cause confusion. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Bakanovases did not leave the United States, and in January 2007 they were arrested on immigration charges and released on bond. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
United States   Research and Resources Privacy by Default, Abuse by Design: EU Competition Concerns About Apple’s New App Tracking Policy, Hausfeld Competition Bulletin, Spring 2021, Thomas Hoppner and Philipp Westerhoff, Technical University Wildau and Hausfeld RA LLP. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm by Ellie Rudnick
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Becerra v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
United States The manager of a New York City Shake Shack restaurant said he was unlawfully detained by police and “taunted” after he was falsely accused last year of poisoning three officers’ milkshakes. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:29 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
Note: These activities are generally protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and should not be reported in a SAR, absent articulable facts and circumstances that support suspicion that the behavior observed is not innocent, but rather reasonably indicative of criminal activity associated with terrorism, including evidence of pre-operational planning related to terrorism. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:13 am by Thomas J. Bean
The Federal Circuit noted that the law of broadening reissues was first developed by the Supreme Court in the 1881 decision Miller v. [read post]