Search for: "Murphy v. Murphy"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 2,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm
Pundits understand this will be the first civil jury trial to be set down in Invercargill since Murphy v Kelly in 1919 (settled on the eve of trial, but which, as a sign of different times, would have been the eleventh libel jury trial in Invercargill since 1882). [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Gary B. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:21 am
Aceves, Murphy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
Today the justices will hear oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
Murphy (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 1277.) [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
Murphy (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 1277.) [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:26 am
When Chief Justice Rehnquist authored South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:49 am
* Murphy v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 3:06 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:06 pm
United States, which interpreted the Fourth Amendment to impose certain limits on the warrantless collection of the historical cell phone location records of a criminal suspect; (3) Murphy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am
District of Columbia along with conservatives Thomas, Alito and Kennedy, and he authored the majority opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
Murphy, 521 U. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 3:17 am
That opinion overturned Roe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:35 pm
The current approach to severability was outlined, most recently, in Murphy v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
” The Appellate Division ruled that the individual was entitled to such a hearing [Murphy v City of New York, 35 AD3d 319].Further, on the issue of “public disclosure,” courts have ruled that the internal disclosure of allegedly stigmatizing reasons for the discharge or demotion of an employee to agency administrators “having a right to know” does not constitute a public disclosure of such information and thus a name-clearing hearing" was not… [read post]
20 May 2020, 10:59 am
That order was issued in the Clinic’s case Gusciora v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:58 pm
” Texas often granted requests to have Christian chaplains in the execution room until last year’s Supreme Court ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:27 am
” However, he noted, courts have recognized an exception to this general proposition “where a specific statutory provision authorizes a long-term contractual arrangement,” citing Murphy v Erie County, 28 NY2d 80.Holding that Sections 2507(1) and 2507(3) constituted such statutory provisions, the Commissioner ruled that each time a school board enters into a multi-year “it necessarily binds successor boards. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:23 am
Despite almost half the states legalizing sports betting since the Supreme Court overturned the federal ban in Murphy v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:30 pm
[Murphy v Kenneth Cole Productions, 40 Cal.4th 1094 (2007)], but in certain cases, a 1 year filing deadline could apply. [read post]
