Search for: "People v David S." Results 2041 - 2060 of 5,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 9:52 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
Whilst this Kat would have assumed that the name of the city was widely known ever since N.W.A.'s 1998 album, 'Straight Outta Compton', the General Court found the people who were aware of the city would amount to only a few percentage points of the overall population, a group too small to invalidate two trade marks for ‘Compton’ as geographical names. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
"Then there's the anti-hippie ordinance (which prohibited people from sitting in a park at Carmel-by-the-Sea), which the California Supreme Court struck down in 1971 in  Parr v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 7:21 am by Cody M. Poplin
The gang discusses McCants’s new piece on al Baghdadi, General David Petraeus's plan to prompt the Al Qaeda awakening in Syria, and New York Times reporter Scott Shane’s new book on Anwar al Awlaki. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
Florida, argued last month, “we can be confident that” the Court’s decision in Schriro v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:40 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A more pointed analysis of TAVIS in the context of s. 24(2) occurred in R. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of the Court’s denial of review in Authors Guild v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
One stems from the Court’s ruling last year, in Rucho v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
This is because the case will be suitable to proceed as a class action if some issues, including common impact, may be resolved for a class of people using common evidence at a common issues trial. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am by Kiran Bhat
Writing at ACSblog, Rochelle Bobroff previews Monday’s arguments in Douglas v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:02 am by Howard Wasserman
One noteable feature of last week's oral argument in Snyder v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
However, the court also stressed that Phillips’ refusal to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins occurred before the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under CPLR 302 (a) (1), ” ‘a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over any non-domiciliary . . . who in person or through an agent . . . transacts any business within the state’ ” (People v Frisco Mktg. of NY LLC, 93 AD3d 1352, 1353 [4th Dept 2012]). [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 12:17 pm by Florian Mueller
And an excessive royalty isn't less excessive just because some people accept it. [read post]