Search for: "People v. Bear"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 5,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2022, 9:22 am
For example, the Bush v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:58 am
Aigner v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:31 am
Supreme Court ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:00 am
Myers, Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Arconti v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
Under Lorillard v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 4:54 am
As it’s a gun case, it’s inherently overlaid with angst about guns, the public distinction that some constitutional rights are “good” rights, at least when applied to people we like, while the Second Amendment right to bear arms is an evil right because we hate guns. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 12:01 pm
He filed an amicus brief in support of the government’s cert petition in Trump v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:07 pm
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 4:21 pm
On Monday, June 28, 2010, in McDonald v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:14 am
U.S.) and executive officials (in Printz v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 4:06 am
" People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:49 am
The “common-sense purpose” of the Kelly rule requires that it be applied whenever a party is trying to introduce scientific techniques that, though “new, novel, or experimental, convey a misleading aura of certainty.” People v Stoll (1989) 49 C3d 1136, 1156. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm
As you probably do not recall (or never knew), in Taniguchi v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
But the episode bears a lot of reflection. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:45 am
Three days later, in Kennedy v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 2:52 am
” Hancock v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 9:51 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 1:26 pm
Over a decade ago, applying the then-prevailing intermediate scrutiny standard of review, we held the magazine cap did not violate the right to bear arms secured by the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which provides: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
