Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 2041 - 2060 of 4,178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am by Fred Goldsmith
Sept. 11, 2009), the plaintiff seaman was allowed, in the wake of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by INFORRM
The “argument grounded in jurisprudence” concerns developments in the United States and the Commonwealth (at [66] et seq.). [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
With the current agreement between Israel and the United States is set to expire in 2017, Netanyahu sought an increase in annual aid from $3 billion to $4.5 billion. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:12 am by hjabbar
 Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), and Albemarle Paper Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Google is expected to pay a multimillion dollar penalty from the Federal Trade Commission over its handling of kids’ information on its popular video site YouTube. [read post]
18 May 2018, 7:41 am by Deborah Pearlstein
  The idea that the Court is untroubled by broad delegations of power to the President in foreign affairs is most commonly traced to the Court’s 1936 decision United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
Surveillance On 30 January 2023, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal found MI5 agents “unlawfully retained people’s intercepted data,” via the use of surveillance warrants from 2014-2019, Liberty and Privacy International v Security Service [2023] UKIPTrib1. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Monica Goyal
Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293, 301 (1946) (Howey), commonly known as the “Howey Test”. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 2:39 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Court Dismisses Indictment Charging Sex Offender With SORNA Breach Arising From Move to New Jersey United States v. [read post]
The argument that the United States made is: “Look, to the extent that Idaho doesn’t allow doctors to provide the kind of stabilizing care that EMTALA requires them to provide, the federal statute trumps the state law, and the Idaho law has to fall. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
’”  (Catholic Charities of Sacramento, 32 Cal. 4th 527, 565 (2004), quoting United States v. [read post]