Search for: "State of New York v Robert V." Results 2041 - 2060 of 4,742
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
After graduating from Harvard Law School, Dorsen spent five years as an assistant United States attorney in the Southern District of New York in the criminal division under Robert M. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule in a 1984 Washington, D.C., murder case, and Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
In The New York Times, Matt Flegenheimer reports that the Senate is facing “an institution-rattling confrontation” today “over the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Neil M. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:43 am by Steven Mazie
Washington is no New York City: Metro trains don’t start running until 5:00 a.m. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
The second new grant is in Ayestas v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:37 am by SHG
To its credit, the Second Circuit resisted the temptation to go one step beyond the existing law to rewrite it in a way that pretty much everybody in New York believes it should be. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
Paradoxically, perhaps, the project of legalization evidences how a love of ancient custom, in this case the customs and patterns of the post-Westphalian law-state, remains, while power shifts to those, enterprises included, that have brought about a revolution in the state and in the meaning of legalization in a new world order that has yet to be revealed. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:49 pm by Guest Blogger
The New York law here may well be viewed similarly on remand if the Second Circuit views the statute as a consumer protection statute, requiring merchants to include any credit card charges in their stated base price. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:27 am by Jordan Brunner
The New York Times tells us that as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson showered praise on the Turkish government yesterday despite what some critics have decried as its slide toward authoritarianism, he was met only with a laundry list of complaints. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak in The New York Times. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:01 am by Ronald Mann
would have gone even further to respond to the uncertainty about the statute’s application; she recommended that the court instruct the 2nd Circuit on remand to use a “certification” procedure to seek an authoritative explanation of how the statute works from the highest New York state court (the New York Court of Appeals). [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:34 am by Lyle Denniston
The five New York retailers of consumer goods or services challenged the law because they wanted to post signs that stated a single price, but also stating that the added fee will be tacked on for credit-card users. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Adam Liptak in The New York Times, Richard Wolf in USA Today, Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal, Mark Walsh in Education Week, and Jurist’s Paper Chase blog. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 5:04 am
Robert Barker, New York Practice Series – Evidence in New York State and Federal Courts (Nov. 2016). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 5:04 am
Robert Barker, New York Practice Series – Evidence in New York State and Federal Courts (Nov. 2016). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage of the decision and its ripple effect at the hearing comes from Anya Kamenetz and Cory Turner at NPR, John Aguilar and Mark Matthews in The Denver Post, Richard Perez-Pena in The New York Times, Lauren Camera in U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
Six years ago in April, then New York Times columnist Mark Bittman coined the term “ag-gag” to refer to state laws that made it a crime to engage in the undercover filming or photography of animal agriculture without the owner’s permission. [read post]