Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 26,373
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
This decision is interesting to the AmeriKat in light of Henry Carr J's recent decision in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158 in May where it was made clear that the preliminary injunction test is a series of gateways (see Kat report here). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:18 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 11:01 am
State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:32 am
G.G., No. 16-273, the Court issued the following summary disposition:The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of the guidance document issued by the Department of Education and Department of Justice on February 22, 2017.The Court issued a per curiam ruling in Rippo v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 10:41 am
McCarrick; Michigan Lawyers Weekly July 3, 2017 Issue No. 07-93885, 3 pagesThe court’s goal is equityAlthough marital property need not be divided equally, it must be divided equitably in light of a court’s evaluation of the parties’ contributions, faults and needs, held the Michigan Court of Appeals in a published opinion.Elahham v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:02 am
According to the tribunal in Saipem v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:01 pm
Saada v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:39 am
Contrary to the argument made on behalf of AB, a different approach is not required or justified in the light of certain General Comments issued by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, which state that the solitary confinement of persons under 18 should be prohibited in all circumstances. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:17 pm
In Castillo v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:49 am
State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 7:50 pm
Martin v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently held in the case of State v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:02 am
Strauss v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:33 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
With the Court’s December sitting having concluded, coverage is light. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
In two earlier columns (the second of which is here) we discussed McConchie v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:28 am
AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:22 pm
The court has redefined what it means to be unreasonable: rather than looking into whether the interference was unreasonable in light of the community standard and duration of the interference, the court has adopted Justice LaForest's formulation of the test from a case in which he was merely concurring (Tock [Tock v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:38 pm
Most recently, this approach to light duty maintenance payments has been held to be correct by the United States District Court of Louisiana in Owens v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
In Polo v. [read post]
