Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
As all the fine Private International Law practitioners reading this post will know, forum non conveniens requires the Court’s consideration of the test set out by Lord Goff of Chieveley in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
Israel: State Prosecutor Moshe Lador has apologized to former prime minister Ehud Olmert in a libel action which Olmert had issued against him. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
In Bright Lord Judge CJ cited from Lord Camden CJ’s judgment in Entick v Carrington and from William Pitt, Earl of Chatham. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:39 am
Lord Scarman [in Pao On v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:12 am
In this week’s case (ICBC v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:57 am
He approved Lord Bingham’s comments in R v Cambridge Health Authority ex parte B [1995] 1 WLR 898, when he stated: I have no doubt that in a perfect world any treatment which a patient… sought would be provided if doctors were willing to give it, no matter how much it costs… It would however, in my view, be shutting one’s eyes to the real world… It is common knowledge that health authorities of all kinds are constantly pressed to make ends… [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:39 pm
Lord Citation: 2009 WY 135 Docket Number: S-08-0225 Appeal from the District Court of Uinta County, Honorable Dennis L. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
Notwithstanding potential opposition to the plan in the House of Lords, abolition of Section 40 could spell the formal end of the state-backed press regulation system envisaged by the Leveson report. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
As Lord Scarman said in R v Home Secretary ex p. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:04 am
Last Monday the US Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari in the Costco Wholesale Corp v Omega SA case. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
In the words of Lord Atkinson in Adam v.Ward [1917] AC 309 at 334. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 11:29 pm
This “imminent risk” approach was essentially endorsed by the House of Lords in 2009. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 4:24 pm
A similar law was declared by the House of Lords to be incompatible with the British Human Rights Act, 1998 in A v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm
John Catt has indicated that he will take the case to the European Court of Human Rights – historically the court has been far stricter on the requirement of accordance with the law and therefore far less willing to allow the state wide discretionary powers where privacy and surveillance are concerned, resulting in a series of rulings against the UK – see Malone v UK (1984), Hewitt v UK (1992), Liberty & Others v UK (2008), S &… [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
There, Lord Hoffmann questioned the appropriateness of the term deference in describing the relationship between the courts and other branches of state within the separation of powers. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:48 am
But today it came back to life, with the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Big Brother Watch and others v UK. [read post]
