Search for: "State v. Michael A." Results 2041 - 2060 of 13,671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2022, 4:03 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
Cortes-Caban, 691 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2012), and United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:04 am by WSLL
STATE OF WYOMING, ex rel., WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONSTACEY NELSON v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Department of Homeland Security] This is really something: argument that maybe it’s unconstitutional to have too conservative a Supreme Court [David Orentlicher, PrawfsBlawg] High court should review whether California state commission can force grape growers to pay for industry ads [Ilya Shapiro and Michael Finch on Cato amicus seeking cert in Delano Farms v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Supreme Court's use of history (and various reflections on the use of history in judicial decisionmaking) in the recently decided Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:08 pm by David Kopel
(David Kopel) Currently before the Illinois Supreme Court is People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
It's not quite eleven-a-side, but the much-contested case of Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA, Union de Associations de Football, British Sky Broadcasting Limited, Setanta Sports SARL, Group Canal Plus SA and The Motion Picture Association v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, Sanjay Raval, David Greenslade, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen; The Secretary… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:16 pm by Meg Martin
Century 21 Top Realty; Throckmartin v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
A three-judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals unanimously struck down a state voter ID law previously upheld by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:01 am by Genevieve Nadeau
The Supreme Court has never adopted the theory (indeed, it has previously rejected it), but recently agreed to hear Moore v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:27 pm
At the Originalism Blog, University of San Diego law professor Michael Ramsey has some thoughtful commentary on a recent presentation I gave on the original meaning of public use, which was based on a chapter of a book I am currently working on, tentatively entitled The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:00 am by David Ryan
Circuit’s decision in CREW v. [read post]