Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 29,594
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm
In his May 9, 2014 order in Wright v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court in Heckler v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 7:56 am
McMillan v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:17 pm
The Third Circuit affirmed a trial court dismissal, finding the federal claim was not “ripe” under Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
On May 18, 2015, The Supreme Court of the United States (“Supreme Court”) reversed the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ (“9th Circuit”) ruling in Tibble et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:23 pm
Hart In the most recent fee mitigation case, Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:36 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
The dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) for catch-up contributions to an applicable employer plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or over is increased from $2,500 to $3,000.The annual compensation limitation under Section 401(a)(17) for eligible participants in certain governmental plans that, under the plan as in effect on July 1, 1993, allowed cost of living adjustments to the compensation… [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
We are discussing Citizens United v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:16 pm
The Mountain View Police Department and the Stone County Office of Emergency Management are hoping to bring a mobile unit to the state for combating the problem of distracted driving. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 11:43 am
In 1992, in a challenge to such a law in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court reaffirmed Roe in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 1:17 pm
Supreme Court case (United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:49 pm
We further clarify that plaintiffs may establish a special duty when a municipality, acting through its police force, plans and executes a no-knock search warrant at a person’s home, and that such a duty runs to the individuals within the targeted premises at the time the warrant is executed. *** Read full text of decision… [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
Reminds me of those catchy names plaintiff's groups often use (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:48 pm
In Dupree v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 11:25 am
Bay Area Citizens v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 5:49 pm
Wills v Memphis, 2016 WL 1651878 (WD TN 4/25/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Due Process, Equal Protection [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:19 am
” 2010: Following in the footsteps of Varnum v. [read post]
