Search for: "State v. Primes"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 2,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Hyatt ; Janus v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:04 am
. *** In EEOC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
(IP Think Tank) Whitehouse.gov’s 3rd party content under CC-BY (Creative Commons) EFF’s site FreeYourPhone.org launches, pushes for new DMCA exemption (Ars Technica) Corporation of Public Broadcasting agrees on internet royalty payments (ContentAgenda) Music piracy not that bad, industry says (TorrentFreak) US Copyright – Decisions District Court W D Virginia: Judge decides 17,000 illegal downloads don’t equal 17,000 lost sales: United… [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:56 am
(Hague v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
” But even this concept has its limitation, as stated in R v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 863 and Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:54 am
In the courts: BN, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2367 (Admin) (16 September 2011): Sec of State irrational in ignoring fresh evidence in Malawi asylum claim. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel notes that the recent decision in New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:24 pm
However, there is no shortage of cases in which such appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the original requests for payment did not constitute “claims” under the CDA.One recent illustration of this problem involved the distinction between routine and non-routine requests for payment, as addressed by a recent split-panel decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Parsons Global Services, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2025, 5:01 am
A perhaps somewhat over-the-top argument in a motion to dismiss an employment lawsuit (Doe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 1:39 pm
A strong judiciary might well reinstate Roe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 8:47 pm
Khadr, and Canada (Prime Minister) v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am
Secretary of State Antony Blinken has told his Ukrainian counterpart that this progress — marked by Kyiv Embassy charge d’affaires Kristina Kvien’s visit yesterday to commemorate V-E Day — is a testament to Ukraine’s success and Moscow’s failure in the early phase of the war. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:28 am
Further, as noted in Royal Communications Consultants Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:35 am
This is a prime breeding ground for metaphysical speculation. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
In Girao v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
In New York Times v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:33 pm
Last year, Judge Mark Bernstein in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas had a long, scholarly analysis of the state of privilege law in the Kolar v. [read post]
