Search for: "State v. Public Service Commission" Results 2041 - 2060 of 4,897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2016, 10:16 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The New Jersey Civil Service Commission (CSC) ruled that the county had wrongfully terminated her and awarded her back pay. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:16 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The New Jersey Civil Service Commission (CSC) ruled that the county had wrongfully terminated her and awarded her back pay. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
Brower, 42 N.Y.2d 471, 398 N.Y.S.2d 875, 368 N.E.2d 1240 (1977); and, Avco Financial Services Trust v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:46 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
         Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:26 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
         Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Ernesto Falcon
The multi-pronged attempt by state Attorneys General, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Trade Commission to find Google and Facebook liable for violating antitrust law may result in breaking up these giant companies. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It had been handling all of the business of a related firm, Aegis Retirement Income Services. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The hand-downs will be streamed on Supreme Court Live and will then be made available on the Supreme Court’s video on demand service. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
An extension of time was granted in Gluszak v Yeap (No 2) [2021] WASC 283, so that the defendant can counterclaim with respect to publications barred by s.15 of the Limitation Act 2005. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:05 pm by Christopher J. Hubbert
BlockFi Lending LLC (BlockFi) is a New Jersey-based financial services company owned by BlockFi, Inc. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]