Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 8,671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2008, 10:31 pm
Bollinger decision, the Court stated "Context matters when reviewing race-based governmental action under the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:33 am
No statistical expert testified for the state that race did not play a role in jury selection. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:50 am
In Conner v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
In particular, this paper argues, Inclusive Communities is best read to adopt the understanding of equal protection that Justice Kennedy previously articulated in his pivotal concurrence in the 2007 Parents Involved case — which argued that state actions that do not classify individuals based on their race are not constitutionally suspect simply because they are motivated by the purpose of integrating the races. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:18 am
ZOELLER V. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 7:12 pm
It is mandatory that employers post notices regarding the federal laws that forbid job discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, nationality, age, genetic information or disability. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 3:08 pm
In a 5-4 vote, the US Supreme Court found Thursday in Allen v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:01 am
James School v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:24 am
[Post by Venkat] McMillen v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 11:42 am
EEOC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 10:08 am
The case, called Patterson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 8:16 am
In Daniel v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 8:16 am
In Daniel v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:13 am
Lujan v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:13 am
Lujan v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 3:36 pm
The Ninth Circuit upheld GPS surveillance in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:46 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated an award of summary judgment for the defendants in Abrams v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 6:18 am
Fincher v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:21 pm
The case, Syrnik v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:10 pm
Three former Racing Officials sued the race track, claiming that they routinely worked over forty hours in a workweek without proper overtime pay compensation. [read post]
