Search for: "State v. So " Results 2041 - 2060 of 117,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2007, 4:32 am
The 9th holds that the sentencing court need only to state the reasons for a sentence so imposed, citing Rita v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:27 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials so far in State of California v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Article I, §10 specifically states that “[n]o state shall . . . pass any . . . [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm by Business Law Post
Information contained is this article is for informational purposes only, so please check each state’s laws before making any legal or other decisions with respect to your business. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:25 am by tracey
Regina (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice (JUSTICE and another intervening); In re MacDermott’s and McCartney’s Applications for Judicial Review (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 18; [2011] WLR (D) 155 “A miscarriage of justice, within the meaning of section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, occurred where a new fact so undermined the evidence against the defendant that no conviction could possibly be based upon it. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:38 pm
So, I was expecting that Ginsburg might take the opportunity to correct that historical oversight with a concurring opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:14 am by Steve Hall
But the other news left him in “a state of shock”: the two lawyers from the prestigious New York law firm who had agreed to represent him had quit, quite some time before, without so much as a goodbye. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:16 am by The Federalist Society
On January 14, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inWellness Int’l Network, Limited v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:26 am
  Viera, FL—A Florida state court jury last week handed down verdicts totaling $36 million to the family of a smoker who died from lung cancer they claim was caused by a sweeping conspiracy to hide the dangers of cigarettes.Wallace v. [read post]