Search for: "State v. Square" Results 2041 - 2060 of 5,933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2007, 11:46 am
We squarely rejected the proposition that the defendant has the burden to come forward with information in a decision that came down after the sentencing in this case, United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 26/1/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada… [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
The District Court Judge then explained that “Wolff challenges both the government's initial acquisition of his electronic devices and the lawfulness of the two state warrants that the government obtained to search them. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:53 pm by Jennifer Lynch
But it’s hard to square that conclusion with another recent Supreme Court case, Byrd v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:04 am by Juan Antunez
Here's how the Florida Supreme Court stated the rule in Providence Square Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:57 am by Danielle Citron
Today, March 24, is the centennial of the date on which the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Ives v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:15 am
The property at issue is a 17 acre parcel previously owned by the United States and used as an army reserve facility. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:15 am
The property at issue is a 17 acre parcel previously owned by the United States and used as an army reserve facility. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:49 pm by Miles Dolinger
  In Friends of the Willow Glen Trestle v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am by Matrix Law
On Thursday 27th April, the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Worcestershire County Council) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 1957. [read post]