Search for: "State v. W"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 15,631
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2021, 12:20 pm
SharePatel v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:06 pm
North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers & State Employees v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 5:22 am
As relevant here, “Judiciary Law § 487 permits recovery of treble damages in a civil action against an attorney who intentionally deceives the court or a party during the pendency of a judicial proceeding” (Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham, 191 AD3d 1142, 1147 [2021]) or who “[w]illfully delays his [or her] client’s suit with a view to his [or her] own gain” (Judiciary Law § 487 [2]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm
Sanborn, W. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:46 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:44 am
While there is no right to conspire to commit further crimes, there is a right to know if the phone calls are being monitored or recorded. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 11:54 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am
On Wednesday 1st December, the Court will hand down judgment in Fratila and another v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:57 am
The specific question before the Court is “[w]hether the U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
I blogged about the 1938 Wyoming State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 8:10 am
“[W]e hold that the waters of the Middle Claiborne Aquifer are subject to the judicial remedy of equitable apportionment,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the unanimous opinion in Mississippi v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
[v] MINISTÉRIO DE MINAS E ENERGIA. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 12:00 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others heard 10th… [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
”[29] Therefore, the assumptions in this analysis call into question the sufficiency of the grave-danger determination because they produce an estimate in which “the actual number of lives saved is uncertain, and is likely to be substantially less than [the stated basis for the grave-danger determination]. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:21 am
’” Meehan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 1:13 am
IndiaX v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
State Bar of Cal., No. 3:20-cv-06442-LB (N.D. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am
The PRA states that “[t]he United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:52 am
”] From Callahan v. [read post]
