Search for: "The Florida Bar v. Doe"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 2,256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
In this opinion, the Florida Supreme Courtindicated that a motion for rehearing would not be allowed.4Mr. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:44 pm
" Florida Bar v, Feinberg, 760 So.2d 933 (Fla. 2000). [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:58 am
Cunningham v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:58 am
Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
Barash v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 3:48 pm
In its Answer Brief, the State does not address Teffeteller v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:59 pm
In Sims v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:29 pm
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WAYNE TOMPKINS, Petitioner, v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 12:56 pm
Over and above the recognition of an ends of justiceexception to procedural bar rules, the Florida Constitution mustpreclude the execution of the innocent. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 8:34 am
Murray v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Simpson, No. 07-5193, 07-5194 Imposition of a 450-month term of imprisonment and a denial of defendant's motion to dismiss a charge of escape is affirmed over claims that: 1) the sentence was unreasonable; 2) the district court erred in denying a motion to dismiss the escape indictment for violating the Double Jeopardy Clause; and 3) procedurally barred claims. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
As such, I imagine that this proposition does not present the same ground for challenge that California Prop 8 does. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Lee, No. 06-3438 A sentence for various counts of bank fraud and aggravated identity theft is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in running several of the aggravated identity theft counts consecutively to each other; and 2) all of defendant's other issues on appeal were barred by his plea agreement or outside the scope of a remand order, and thus were barred. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 2:33 am
Donkersloot v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:10 pm
" Graf v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
The case is Lubov v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Bissonnette, No. 081094 In a conviction for first degree murder, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial judge's instruction to the jury that the prosecution "does not have the burden of proving that no one else may have committed the murder" was an error that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent as stated in In re Winship; and 2) the trial court violated defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 4:01 am
Geoff, an accomplished blogger known for punchy, no-holds-barred posts like last week’s “Counsel, strap on a pair! [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Cir. 2001).Florida: Buckner v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
For example, the sales director in Florida gave direct payments as inducements to prescribe Genotropin. [read post]
