Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 7,746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
The notion that people inspire songs is not new. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 12:27 pm
Additional Resources: Conti v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Last week marked the 60th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
The critical decision was, I think, Davis. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 10:28 pm
There are nonetheless certain portions of the opinion that seem both doctrinally wrong as well as substantially pernicious in other cases, at least to people (like me) who are seriously concerned with legal ethics.Here, an indigent person called up a public interest organization (California Indian Legal Services) to seek its representation in a lawsuit she wanted to file against her brother regarding a property dispute. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:02 pm
We want people to have their claims heard on the merits, rather than dismissed for a legal reason that we got wrong, and denying res judicata to the second (totally identical) suit solves the problem. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
The benefit cap JR got lost amongst that other stuff partly because it was almost predictable after MA that the Divisional Court would find a way to uphold it.Actually, though, having read it again the other day for a different reason, the benefit cap challenge – R(JS) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) – was very clever (CPAG and Shelter were joined as interveners – CPAG’s arguments can be found here) and the appeal is to be heard pretty soon, having… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
The benefit cap JR got lost amongst that other stuff partly because it was almost predictable after MA that the Divisional Court would find a way to uphold it.Actually, though, having read it again the other day for a different reason, the benefit cap challenge – R(JS) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) – was very clever (CPAG and Shelter were joined as interveners – CPAG’s arguments can be found here) and the appeal is to be heard pretty soon, having… [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:03 am
By Eric Goldman S.C. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Both cases were heard and decided by the same panel of seven Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
Yesterday the justices heard two Fourth Amendment cases, both involving searches of motor vehicles. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:31 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 2:55 pm
" Floyd v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:04 am
In 2000, just before the Bush v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:12 am
I’ve heard it before. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:31 pm
Many of the Toronto Injury Lawyer Blog readers, and non-readers heard about this tragic quadruple fatality claim. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:05 am
I suppose for Connecticut, the Ricci v. [read post]
