Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 9,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2009, 3:13 am
Lydia Krebs won her second KSC case of the day in State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:28 am
In Carrasco v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:28 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
United States, currently pending in the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am
Brief of the United States and the Federal Trade Commission as Amici Curiae Supporting Plaintiffs-Appellee SmileDirectClub, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
After the case was filed in 2001, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified the class in 2004. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
The Appeal The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 7:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 12:48 pm
United States. [read post]
[David Kopel] Restoring the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
9 Aug 2022, 9:19 am
After the Supreme Court decided United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:13 am
’ United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:59 am
Guest Blogger Marshall Mintz provides his take below of United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:08 pm
“The insured bears the initial burden of showing that there is coverage, while the insurer bears the burden of proving the applicability of any exclusions in the policy. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:18 pm
Lilly v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:34 am
Accordingly, the Court found that Rivas could satisfy her burden of establishing that K.S.R. was wrongfully retained in the United States by Segovia. [read post]
