Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 2041 - 2060 of 10,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:19 am by James Romoser
United States, a case pending at the Supreme Court involving the interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
” Section 201(a)(1) defines this category to include members of Congress, as well as “an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 2:45 pm by petrocohen
  He also served as one of 38 National Trustees for the American Inns of Court Foundation, the nation’s leading professional organization promoting legal excellence, professionalism, ethics, and civility for United States judges and lawyers, and held the position of Treasurer from 2008 to 2012. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:31 am by John W. Scanlan
Case date: 25 June 2020 Case number: No. 19-2547-cv Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 8:14 am by Rob Robinson
Editor’s Note: These are the results of the fifth semi-annual Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey conducted by ComplexDiscovery. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 8:20 am by David Post
See Marks v United States ("When no single rationale explaining the result [of a case] enjoys the assent of five Justices, the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds"). [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
In 2018, the United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in South Dakota v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:18 am by Melissa E. Scott
On August 5, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB’s decision to cancel a trademark registration for the mark HOLLYWOOD BEER as a discovery sanction for the registrant’s repeated, frivolous filings and failure to comply with discovery orders. [read post]