Search for: "White v. State" Results 2041 - 2060 of 11,980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 4:35 pm by Vivian Persand
The insureds compared their situation to the facts of the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision in White v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm by NL
Quadrant Brownswood Tenant Cooperative Limited v White (HC 09 C 03494) - an Art 8 challenge to a housing co-op possession claim - was due to be heard on 9 November 2010, but has been adjourned to some date after 4 January 2011. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm by NL
Quadrant Brownswood Tenant Cooperative Limited v White (HC 09 C 03494) - an Art 8 challenge to a housing co-op possession claim - was due to be heard on 9 November 2010, but has been adjourned to some date after 4 January 2011. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:15 am by sally
Supreme Court Principal Reporter v K & Ors (Scotland) [2010] UKSC 56 (15 December 2010) Revenue and Customs v DCC Holdings (UK) Ltd [2010] UKSC 58 (15 December 2010) Edwards & Anor, R (on the application of) v Environment Agency & Ors [2010] UKSC 57 (15 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Pluck v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2936 (15 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Friends of Basildon Golf Course, R (on the application of)… [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm by Richard Pildes
In 2008, for example, Barack Obama won slightly less than 40 percent of the white vote in the state. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 8:42 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Such is the case with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’s recent ruling in NetChoice v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Harvard International Law Journal
For example, in his argument to the Court in United States v. [read post]