Search for: "*u.s. v. Kennedy"
Results 2061 - 2080
of 4,542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2015, 4:59 am
There’s still more commentary on King v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:53 am
Din, scheduled for oral argument later this month, in which the Court will consider whether a U.S. citizen can sue a consular officer over the denial of a visa to a spouse. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 11:20 pm
According to Eskridge, Justice Kennedy’s 1996 opinion in Romer v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Hodges (Ohio), Tanco v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
Fifth Amendment, U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
A final point of interest: This was a 7-2 decision, with Justices Kennedy and Sotomayor dissenting. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
A final point of interest: This was a 7-2 decision, with Justices Kennedy and Sotomayor dissenting. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
A final point of interest: This was a 7-2 decision, with Justices Kennedy and Sotomayor dissenting. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:09 am
Kennedy joined. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
Kennedy sent them to the ACLU whose lawyers brought their case to the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 9:08 pm
Florida’s Supreme Court disagrees with the view of the federal appeals court in its area, the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
The U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:30 pm
Even the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:31 am
To discuss the case, we have Tyler Green, who is Associate Chief Counsel at the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:05 am
Kennedy and Alito joined. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
Mach Mining v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:09 am
Feigin, an assistant to the U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 12:24 pm
(Justice Kennedy did play a prominent role in one debate about what counts as “content-based,” in Hill v. [read post]